From the Journals

Cerebral protection in TAVI cuts ischemic lesions

View on the News

Hossein G. Almassi, MD, FCCP, comments

As there was no significant difference in clinical neurological outcomes related to use of a filter device, although there was significantly fewer and smaller brain lesions in the stroke group, one is left to conclude that the majority of MRI findings after TAVI are not clinically relevant. Is the added cost of a cerebral protection device cost effective given the equivalent neurological outcomes in the both groups?


 

The investigators pointed out that protective filter devices can protect the brain only while they are in place during TAVI, “which usually takes less than 1 hour and represents only 2% of the first 48 hours after which the first MRI was performed in this study. Based on the analyzed material captured and removed by the filters – e.g., old and fresh thrombus, endothelium, atheromatous plaque, valve tissue, and calcium – it becomes evident that causes of cerebral injury are multifactorial and that the embolic risk does not resolve immediately at the end of the TAVI procedure,” they said.

Perhaps the study’s most surprising finding was that nearly every patient had new cerebral lesions consistent with infarcts, but most of these were very small and not associated with any neurocognitive or functional impairments.

This study was limited in that it involved a single cardiac team assessing only one brand of filter device at a single hospital, so the results are not necessarily generalizable to a broader patient population or to the many other devices that have since been developed, Dr. Haussig and his associates added.

This study was funded by a grant from Claret Medical and Medtronic. Dr. Haussig reported having no relevant financial disclosures; his associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

Pages

Next Article: