ORLANDO – Boys with hemophilia have a better quality of life when they are managed with intensive bleeding prophylaxis with clotting factor concentrates rather than on-demand therapy, results of an international study suggest.
An analysis of pooled data from six studies conducted in eight countries showed that boys with severe hemophilia who received limited on-demand factor replacement had significantly lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores than did boys treated prophylactically, reported Victoria Price, MB, of Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S., and colleagues.
“Early initiation of intensive prophylaxis has the greatest impact on HRQoL in boys with severe hemophilia. HRQoL in boys with severe hemophilia exposed to early initiation of intensive prophylaxis is comparable to boys with mild hemophilia receiving on-demand therapy,” they wrote in a scientific poster presented at the World Federation of Hemophilia World Congress.
In countries where patients have access to safe clotting factor concentrates, prophylaxis has become the standard of care for management of hemophilia A and B, because it has been shown to reduce the frequency of bleeds. But because of the small sample sizes in most studies of hemophilia, it has been difficult to determine whether prophylaxis actually has a significant effect on HRQoL, the investigators noted.
To get an answer to that question, they looked at data from six studies in boys younger than 18 that measured HRQoL using the same standard instrument, the Canadian Haemophilia Outcomes–Kids’ Life Assessment Tool (CHO-KLAT). The studies were conducted in Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, and the United Kingdom.
Patients in the studies were grouped into one of five categories:
• Early initiation with intensive prophylaxis (Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, UK)
• Gradual initiation with intensive prophylaxis (Canada, France)
• Late initiation with limited prophylaxis (Brazil, China)
• On-demand with good access to factor (Canada and European nations)
• On-demand with variable or limited access to factor (Brazil and China).
Data on a total of 254 boys with severe hemophilia were analyzed and compared with estimated scores from boys with mild hemophilia in the pooled dataset.
Of the boys with severe hemophilia, 220 (86.6% had hemophilia A, and 34 (13.4%) had hemophilia B. They ranged in age from 4.4 to 17.9 years; 21 of the boys were younger than 7 years.
The investigators found that in a linear regression model, patients with early initiation and intensive prophylaxis had the highest CHO-KLAT scores, followed by those who had gradual initiation with intensive prophylaxis (P = .003), late initiation/limited prophylaxis (P = .005), on-demand with good access (P = .008) and, lastly, on-demand with limited access to factor (P less than .001)
The authors noted that the differences by treatment group in the analysis were defined by expert consensus, and may not reflect changes in treatment protocols over the last 10 years. The studies were published between 2006 and 2016.
“Despite this limitation, important differences were observed between groups,” they wrote.
The studies were supported by grants from the Canadian Haemophilia Society and the Society of Haemophilia Clinic Directors of Canada, Bayer, Baxalta, and CSL Behring. The authors did not report conflict of interest disclosures.