Dr. Swislocki is chief of the Endocrine Section and assistant chief of the Medical Service, and Dr. Falk is a staff physician in Nuclear Medicine at the VA Northern California Health Care System. Dr. Swislocki is also a professor of medicine in the Department of Internal Medicine at the University of California Davis School of Medicine.
The patient had no pain in the area and, upon further questioning, reported that he returned wearing the same athletic shorts. Given that radioiodine is excreted in the urine, this atypical distribution was thought to reflect urinary contamination. When images were taken again with the shorts removed, no abnormal radioiodine activity was present (see Figures 2C and 2D). Additional findings with thyrotropin alfa stimulation included increased quantitative thyroglobulin values of 20.2 ng/mL with antithyroglobulin antibody < 20.0 U/mL. Radioiodine ablation therapy using thyrotropin alfa was repeated. Iodine localization also was not present in the hip on posttherapy imaging (not shown).
Despite advances in imaging techniques, radioiodine scanning remains an imperfect science. Artifacts and pitfalls have been identified; in part, these are related to the accumulation of iodide in organs other than the thyroid, such as the nasopharynx and stomach, as well as the apparent accumulation due to excretion in the gut and bladder.2-4 These variations can be divided into ectopic normal thyroid tissue, physiologic accumulation in nonthyroidal tissue, and contamination by physiologic secretions. Recent case reports have confirmed this classification. Abnormal radioiodine uptake has been described in vertebral hemangioma,5 liver abscess6 and hydatid cyst,7 bronchiectasis,8 bronchogenic cyst and mucinous cystadenoma (2 fluid-filled cavities),9 chronic submandibular sialadenitis,10 esophageal diverticulum,11 hiatal hernia,12 appendix,13 indwelling Hickman catheter,14 renal cyst,15 and, similar to this case, contamination of the hair.16
Contaminated clothing is not uncommon; however, a persistent abnormality from contaminated clothing on repeat follow-up is unusual and could easily be misinterpreted.2 It would be valuable for all providers to be aware of the pitfalls of imaging before embarking on an unnecessary and potentially hazardous—not to mention costly—treatment course.
Acknowledgments The authors acknowledge the assistance of Richard Cacciato, MLIS, Medical Librarian, who assisted in the literature review.
Author disclosures The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.
Disclaimer The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the U.S. Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.