Extended follow-up data from the phase 3 CheckMate 274 trial continue to show that, compared with placebo, nivolumab improves disease-free survival, nonurothelial tract recurrence-free survival (NUTRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in patients with high-risk, muscle-invasive urothelial cancer after undergoing radical surgery.
The benefit was observed in both in the intent-to-treat population (ITT) and in the subset of patients with programmed death–ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of at least 1%.
“In the ITT population, median disease-free survival with nivolumab was doubled compared to placebo,” said lead author Matthew Galsky, MD, director of genitourinary medical oncology and codirector of the Center of Excellence for Bladder Cancer at Tisch Cancer Institute, New York. “For the patients with high PD-L1 expression, the median disease-free survival with nivolumab reached 52.6 months, more than six times that of the placebo arm.
“These results further support adjuvant nivolumab as a standard of care in high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial cancer after resection,” he concluded.
Dr. Galsky presented the findings at the 2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium.
Practice changing
The earlier results of this study have already led to an approval from the Food and Drug Administration. In August 2021, nivolumab became the first adjuvant immunotherapy for use in patients with urothelial carcinoma at high risk for recurrence after radical resection
“This is a practice-changing study,” said Scot Niglio, MD, medical oncologist, New York University Perlmutter Cancer Center, who was approached for an independent comment.
“For decades, there were limited to zero treatment options in the postsurgical setting for urothelial cancer patients with a high recurrence risk,” he said.
The standard of care for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma is surgery, which may include neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy, but most patients will experience disease recurrence, he explained.
“When urothelial cancer recurs outside the urinary tract, the prognosis quickly changes from curable to incurable,” he said, “making this area of research paramount.”
Dr. Niglio emphasized that these updated results show continued benefit from nivolumab on disease-free survival, as well as nonurothelial tract recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival, supporting its use as standard of care therapy.
“Even though the overall survival data is still maturing, the current data remains promising,” he said. “Patients with urothelial cancer meeting the criteria for high risk now have a treatment option to mitigate the potential of distant recurrence.”
In his own practice, Dr. Niglio added that he will “continue to discuss adjuvant nivolumab as a potential treatment option with all patients who are eligible based on this study.”
Met all endpoints
The Checkmate 274 trial involved 353 patients (of whom 140 patients had PD-L1 ≥ 1%) randomly assigned to take nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks and 356 patients (with 142 patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1%) randomized to placebo. All patients had pathologic evidence of urothelial cancer at high risk of recurrence and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of1 or less.
Previous results, at a median follow-up of about 20 months, show that the study met its primary endpoint, showing significant prolongation of disease-free survival in the intention-to-treat population, with nivolumab at 21 months versus placebo at 10.9 months (hazard ratio, 0.70; P < .001).
When the analysis considered only patients with tumors expressing PD-L1 of at least 1%, the median disease-free survival was even higher (not reached vs. 10.8 months; HR, 0.53; P < .001).
Nivolumab was also superior to placebo for NUTRFS, in both in the entire ITT population and in the subset with PD-L1–positive tumors.
The latest results come from a median follow-up of 36.1 months. The median disease-free survival was 22 months with nivolumab, compared with 10.9 months with placebo in ITT patients and 52.6 months on nivolumab versus 8.4 months in patients with PD-L1 of at least 1%.
Nivolumab was superior to placebo for secondary and exploratory endpoints, NUTRFS (ITT: HR, 0.72 and PD-L1 ≥ 1%: HR, 0.53) and DMFS (ITT: HR, 0.74; PD-L1 ≥ 1%: HR, 0.58). However, overall survival data remained immature and will be assessed as a future data cutoff, Dr. Galsky explained.
The updated analysis also included another exploratory endpoint, progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), defined as time from randomization to disease progression after subsequent next-line systemic therapy, start of second subsequent next-line systemic therapy, or death.
Median PFS2 was 61.2 months for all-patients who received nivolumab versus 47.1 months with placebo (HR, 0.79). In the PD-L1 of 1% or greater subgroup, median PFS2 was not reached with nivolumab versus 39.4 months with placebo (HR, 0.54).
Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 18.2% and 7.2% of patients (nivolumab vs. placebo), and this was consistent with the primary analysis. “No new safety signals were identified,” said Dr. Galsky.
The CheckMate 274 trial was funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb, manufacturer of nivolumab. Dr. Galsky reported relationships with numerous pharmaceutical companies.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
