Obtain gastric biopsies to check for Helicobacter pylori infection in patients undergoing routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy for dyspepsia, even if their mucosa appears normal and they’re immunocompetent, the American Gastroenterological Association advises in a new guideline for upper gastrointestinal biopsy to evaluate dyspepsia in the adult patient in the absence of visible mucosal lesions, which was published in the October issue of Gastroenterology.
The group suggests taking five biopsy specimens from the gastric body and antrum using the updated Sydney System; placing the samples in the same jar; and relying on routine staining to make the call. “Experienced GI pathologists can determine the anatomic location of biopsy specimens sent from the stomach, which obviates the need for” – and cost of – “separating specimens into multiple jars.” They can also identify “virtually all cases of H. pylori .... Therefore, routine use of ancillary special staining” needlessly adds cost, said the guideline authors, led by Dr. Yu-Xiao Yang of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia (Gastroenterology. 2015 Aug 14. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.039).
©sgame/thinkstockphotos.com
The group also counsels against routine biopsies of normal-appearing esophagus and gastroesophageal junctions in patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for dyspepsia, regardless of their immune status.
It does recommend biopsies of normal-appearing duodenum in immunocompromised patients to check for opportunistic infections and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after bone marrow transplant, but counsels against routine duodenum biopsies in immunocompetent patients undergoing EGD solely for dyspepsia if signs and symptoms of celiac disease are absent. Again, routine use of special staining isn’t necessary. “Studies using [hematoxylin and eosin] counting methods show similar results as those obtained using CD3 [T-cell marker] stains,” the authors wrote.
The purpose of the guideline is to establish evidence-based standards for biopsies of normal-appearing mucosa in the upper gastrointestinal tract. No such standards existed until now, so “there [is] likely wide practice variation in whether or not such biopsies of normal-appearing mucosa are obtained,” they said.
The advice is based on a thorough review of the medical literature, and a grading of its strength. The guideline is meant for adult patients undergoing EGD solely for dyspepsia, and assumes that endoscopic biopsy has negligible complications.
The esophageal biopsy recommendations are strong, meaning that “most individuals should receive the recommended course of action.” The gastric biopsy advice is a mix of both strong and conditional recommendations, while the duodenal biopsy recommendations are conditional. Evidence for each recommendation ranged from very low to moderate.
Regarding gastric biopsy, H. pylori can lurk in normal-looking mucosa, and evidence supports detection and treatment for both symptom relief and cancer risk reduction. In the immunocompromised, gastric biopsies can also help detect cytomegalovirus infection.
The five-biopsy Sydney System gathers specimens from the lesser and greater curve of the gastric antrum, lesser curvature of the corpus, middle portion of the greater curvature of the corpus, and the incisura angularis. The thorough approach probably detects H. pylori missed by a three-biopsy method, with little added cost.
Esophageal biopsies of normal mucosa aren’t necessary, the authors said, because “although a number of microscopic changes in the esophageal mucosa can be seen in patients with” gastroesophageal reflux disease, they aren’t much help in distinguishing it from heartburn or even healthy controls. For immune compromised patients, GVHD is more likely to show up at other sites, such as the duodenum.
Although the group counsels against routine duodenum biopsies in immunocompetent patients, it did note that “if the suspicion of celiac disease is high, biopsies of the normal-appearing duodenum may be of value even if serologies ... are negative.”
Funding source and disclosures for the work are available from AGA.
