Clinical Topics & News

Experts Weigh in on Medication Overuse Headache


 

Accordingly, patients with CM with acute medication overuse should be treated with optimal prevention, and the evidence is strongest for use of the mAbs to both reduce mean monthly migraine days and all acute medication use, both triptans and analgesics. The new monoclonal antibody effectiveness may make the old arguments moot.

Hans-Christoph Diener, MD, PhD
University of Essen, Germany

I think no one doubts that MOH exists. The worldwide prevalence is between 1% and 2% ( Table). The dilemma is that the diagnosis can only be made after the intake of acute medication has been reduced. There are confounders: migraine can improve irrespective of the reduction of acute medication and many physicians will implement migraine prevention at the time of withdrawal. No randomized trial compared the continuation of unchanged intake of medication to treat migraine attacks with reduction or withdrawal.

Table. Summary of studies evaluating the prevalence of medication overuse headache by publication year and country 5,6
Author (year) (reference) CountryAge Group Prevalence of MOH

Castillo et al. (1999) 7

Spain

≥ 14

1,2%

Wang et al. (2000) 8

Taiwan

≥ 65

1,0%

Lu et al. (2001) 9

Taiwan

≥ 15

1,1%

Pascual et al. (2001) 10

Review

1,0-1,9%

Prencipe et al. (2001) 11

France

≥ 65

1,7%

Colas et al. (2004) 12

Spain

≥ 14

1,5%

Zwart et al. (2004) 13

Norway

≥ 20

0,9-1,0%

Dyb et al. (2006) 14

Norway

13-18

0,2%

Wang et al. (2006) 15

Taiwan

12-14

0,3%

Wiendels (2006) 16

Netherlands

25-55

2,6%

Stovner et al.(2007) 17

Review

0,5-1,0%

Aaseth et al. (2008, 2009) 18,19

Norway

30-44

1,7%

Rueda-Sanchez & Diaz-Martinez (2008) 20

Columbia

18-65

4,5%

Katsarava et al. (2009) 21

Georgia

≥ 16

0,9%

Da Silva et al. (2009) 22

Brazil

10-93

1,6%

Straube et al. (2010) 23

Germany

18-88

1,0%

Jonsson et al. (2011, 2012) 24,25

Sweden

≥ 15

1,8%

Linde et al. (2011) 26

Norway

≥ 20

1,0%

Lipton et al. (2011) 27

USA

12-17

1,0%

Ayzenberg et al. (2012) 28

Russia

18-65

7,2%

Ertas et al. (2012) 29

Turkey

18-65

2,1%

Hagen et al. (2012) 30

Norway

≥ 20

0,8%

Yu et al. (2012) 31

China

18-65

0,9%

Shahbeigi et al. (2013) 32

Iran

≥ 10

4,9%

Schramm et al. (2013) 33

Germany

18-65

0,7%

Park et al. (2014) 34

South Korea

19-69

0,5%

Kristoffersen & Lundqvist (2014) 35

Multinational summary

1,0-2,0%

Steiner (2014) 36

Multinational summary

1,0-2,0%

Westergaard et al. (2015) 37

Denmark

0,5-7,2%

Bravo (2015) 38

Multinational

Older

1,0-7,1%

Mbewe et al. (2015) 39

Zambia

18-65

12,7% (adj. 7,1%)

Kulkarni et al. (2015) 40

India

18-65

1,2%

Westergaard et al. (2016) 41

Denmark

≥ 16

1,6% (adj. 1,8%)

Manandhar et al. (2016) 42

Nepal

18-65

2,2%

Zebenigus et al. (2016) 43

Ethiopia

18-65

0,8% (adj. 0,7%)

Al-Hashel et al. (2017) 44

Kuwait

18-65

2,4%

Rastenyte et al. (2017) 45

Lithuania

18-65

3,5% (adj. 3,2%)

Henning et al. (2018) 46

Germany

18-65

0,7%

Global Burden of Disease 2017 47

Global

0,8%

+++

Commentary by Alan M. Rapoport, MD

Pages

Next Article: