Article

Chemical Derived From Broccoli Sprouts Shows Promise in Treating Autism


 

References

Sulforaphane, a chemical derived from broccoli sprouts, may ease classic behavioral symptoms in patients with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), according to a study published online ahead of print October 13 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The study involved 40 males, ages 13 to 27, with moderate to severe autism. Many participants who received a daily dose of sulforaphane experienced substantial improvements in their social interaction and verbal communication, along with decreases in repetitive, ritualistic behaviors, compared with those who received a placebo, according to the researchers.

“We believe that this may be preliminary evidence for the first treatment for autism that improves symptoms by apparently correcting some of the underlying cellular problems,” said Paul Talalay, MD, Professor of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.

“We are far from being able to declare a victory over autism, but this gives us important insights into what might help,” said coinvestigator Andrew Zimmerman, MD, Professor of Pediatric Neurology at UMass Memorial Medical Center in Worcester.

Cause of Autism Is Elusive
Researchers estimate that ASD affects 1% to 2% of the world’s population, with a much higher incidence in boys than in girls. Its behavioral symptoms, such as poor social interaction and verbal communication, are well known and were first described 70 years ago by Leo Kanner, MD.

Unfortunately, its root causes remain elusive, though progress has been made, Dr. Talalay said, in describing some of the biochemical and molecular abnormalities that tend to accompany ASD. Many of these are related to the efficiency of energy generation in cells. Studies show that the cells of patients with ASD often have high levels of oxidative stress, the buildup of harmful, unintended byproducts from the cell’s use of oxygen that can cause inflammation, damage DNA, and lead to cancer and other chronic diseases.

In 1992, Dr. Talalay’s research group found that sulforaphane can bolster the body’s natural defenses against oxidative stress, inflammation, and DNA damage. In addition, the chemical later was found to improve the body’s heat-shock response, a cascade of events used to protect cells from the stress caused by high temperatures, including those experienced when people have fever.

About one-half of parents report that their children’s autistic behavior improves noticeably when they have a fever, then reverts back when the fever is gone. In 2007, Dr. Zimmerman tested this anecdotal trend clinically and found it to be true, though a mechanism for the fever effect was not identified. Because fevers, similar to sulforaphane, initiate the body’s heat-shock response, Drs. Zimmerman and Talalay wondered if sulforaphane could cause the same temporary improvement in autism that fevers do.

Improvement Linked to Sulforaphane
Before the start of the trial, the patients’ caregivers and physicians filled out three standard behavioral assessments—the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC), the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), and the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (CGI-I). The assessments measure sensory sensitivities, ability to relate to others, verbal communication skills, social interactions, and other behaviors related to autism. Twenty-six participants were randomly selected to receive, based on their weight, 9 to 27 mg of sulforaphane daily, and 14 received placebo. Behavioral assessments were again completed at four, 10, and 18 weeks while treatment continued. A final assessment was completed for most of the participants four weeks after the treatment had stopped.

Most subjects who responded to sulforaphane showed significant improvements by the first measurement at four weeks and continued to improve during the rest of the treatment. After 18 weeks of treatment, the average ABC and SRS scores of those who received sulforaphane had decreased 34% and 17%, respectively, with improvements in bouts of irritability, lethargy, repetitive movements, hyperactivity, awareness, communication, motivation, and mannerisms.

After 18 weeks of treatment, according to the CGI-I scale, 46%, 54%, and 42% of sulforaphane recipients experienced noticeable improvements in social interaction, aberrant behaviors, and verbal communication, respectively.

Dr. Talalay noted that the scores of those who took sulforaphane trended back toward their original values after they stopped taking the chemical, similar to what happens to those who experience improvements during a fever. “It seems like sulforaphane is temporarily helping cells to cope with their handicaps,” he said.

Dr. Zimmerman added that before his group learned which subjects received the sulforaphane or placebo, the impressions of the clinical team, including parents, were that 13 participants noticeably improved. For example, some treated subjects looked them in the eye and shook their hands, which they had not done before. They found out later that all 13 had been taking sulforaphane, which is half of the treatment group. Dr. Talalay cautioned that the levels of sulforaphane precursors present in different varieties of broccoli are highly variable. Furthermore, the capacity of individuals to convert these precursors to active sulforaphane also varies greatly. It would be difficult, he noted, to achieve the levels of sulforaphane used in this study by eating large amounts of broccoli or other cruciferous vegetables.

Next Article: