Evidence-Based Reviews

Losing a patient to suicide: Navigating the aftermath

Current Psychiatry. 2019 November;18(11):17-18,20,22-24

References

1. Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. Beyond the concept of recovery: Growth and the experience of loss. Death Stud. 2008;32(1):27-39.
2. Fuentes MA, Cruz D. Posttraumatic growth: positive psychological changes after trauma. Mental Health News. 2009;11(1):31,37.
3. Gitlin M. Aftermath of a tragedy: reaction of psychiatrists to patient suicides. Psychiatr Ann. 2007;37(10):684-687.
4. Huhra R, Hunka N, Rogers J, et al. Finding meaning: theoretical perspectives on patient suicide. Paper presented at: 2004 Annual Conference of the American Association of Suicidology; April 2004; Miami, FL.
5. Jones FA Jr. Therapists as survivors of patient suicide. In: Dunne EJ, McIntosh JL, Dunne-Maxim K, eds. Suicide and its aftermath: understanding and counseling the survivors. New York, NY: W.W. Norton; 1987;126-141.
6. Gutin N, McGann VM, Jordan JR. The impact of suicide on professional caregivers. In: Jordan J, McIntosh J, eds. Grief after suicide: understanding the consequences and caring for the survivors. New York, NY: Routledge; 2011:93-111.
7. Hendin H, Lipschitz A, Maltsberger JT, et al. Therapists’ reactions to patients’ suicides. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157(12):2022-2027.
8. Munson JS. Impact of client suicide on practitioner posttraumatic growth [dissertation]. Gainesville, Florida: University of Florida; 2009.
9. Grad OT. Therapists as survivors of suicide loss. In: Wasserman D, Wasserman C, eds. Oxford textbook of suicidology and suicide prevention. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2009:609-615.
10. Douglas J, Brown HN. Suicide: understanding and responding: Harvard Medical School perspectives. Madison, CT: International Universities Press; 1989.
11. Farberow NL. The mental health professional as suicide survivor. Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2005;2(1):13-20.
12. Plakun EM, Tillman JG. Responding to clinicians after loss of a patient to suicide. Dir Psychiatry. 2005;25:301-310.
13. Quinnett P. QPR: for suicide prevention. QPR Institute, Inc. www.cliniciansurvivor.org (under Postvention tab). Published September 21, 2009. Accessed August 26, 2019.
14. Schultz, D. Suggestions for supervisors when a therapist experiences a client’s suicide. Women Ther. 2005;28(1):59-69.
15. Spiegelman JS Jr, Werth JL Jr. Don’t forget about me: the experiences of therapists-in-training after a patient has attempted or died by suicide. Women Ther. 2005;28(1):35-57.
16. American Association of Suicidology. Clinician Survivor Task Force. Clinicians as survivors of suicide: postvention information. http://cliniciansurvivor.org. Published May 16, 2016. Accessed January 13, 2019.
17. Whitmore CA, Cook J, Salg L. Supporting residents in the wake of patient suicide. The American Journal of Psychiatry Residents’ Journal. 2017;12(1):5-7.
18. Ellis TE, Patel AB. Client suicide: what now? Cogn Behav Pract. 2012;19(2):277-287.
19. Figueroa S, Dalack GW. Exploring the impact of suicide on clinicians: a multidisciplinary retreat model. J Psychiatr Pract. 2013;19(1):72-77.
20. Lerner U, Brooks, K, McNeil DE, et al. Coping with a patient’s suicide: a curriculum for psychiatry residency training programs. Acad Psychiatry. 2012;36(1):29-33.
21. Prabhakar D, Balon R, Anzia J, et al. Helping psychiatry residents cope with patient suicide. Acad Psychiatry. 2014;38(5):593-597.
22. Kaye NS, Soreff SM. The psychiatrist’s role, responses, and responsibilities when a patient commits suicide. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148(6):739-743.
23. McGann VL, Gutin N, Jordan JR. Guidelines for postvention care with survivor families after the suicide of a client. In: Jordan JR, McIntosh JL, eds. Grief after suicide: understanding the consequences and caring for the survivors. New York, NY: Routledge; 2011:133-155.
24. Hodgkinson PE. Responding to in-patient suicide. Br J Med Psychol. 1987;60(4):387-392.

Guidelines for postvention

When a patient suicide occurs in the context of an agency setting, Grad⁹ recommends prompt responses on 4 levels:

administrative
institutional
educational
emotional.

Numerous authors^5,10-21 have developed suggestions, guidelines, and detailed postvention protocols to help agencies and clinicians in various mental health settings navigate the often-complicated sequelae to a patient’s suicide. The Table highlights a few of these. Most emphasize that information about suicide loss, including both its statistical likelihood and its potential aftermath, should integrated into clinicians’ general education and training. They also suggest that suicide postvention policies and protocols be in place from the outset, and that such information be incorporated into institutional policy and procedure manuals. In addition, they stress that legal, institutional, and administrative needs be balanced with the emotional needs of affected clinicians and staff, as well as those of the surviving family.

Institutional and administrative procedures

The following are some of the recommended procedures that should take place following a suicide loss. The postvention protocols listed in the Table provide more detailed recommendations.

Legal/ethical. It is essential to consult with a legal representative/risk management specialist associated with the affected agency (ideally, one with specific expertise in suicide litigation.). It is also crucial to clarify who holds privilege after a patient’s death (varies by state), what may and may not be shared under the restrictions of confidentiality and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) laws, and to clarify procedures for chart completion and review. It is also important to clarify the specific information to be shared both within and outside of the agency, and how to address the needs of current patients in the agency settings.

Case review. The optimal purpose of the case review (also known as a psychological autopsy) is to facilitate learning, identify gaps in agency procedures and training, improve pre- and postvention procedures, and help clinicians cope with the loss.²² Again, the legal and administrative needs of the agency need to be balanced with the attention to the emotional impact on the treating clinician.¹⁷ Ellis and Patel¹⁸ recommend delaying this procedure until the treating clinician is no longer in the “shock” phase of the loss, and is able to think and process events more objectively.

Continue to: Family contact

References

Expect some congressional action on drug prices, but not major reform

Losing a patient to suicide: Navigating the aftermath

References

Guidelines for postvention

Institutional and administrative procedures

Pages

Next Article: