patient and her father
Photo by Rhoda Baer
Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) are less likely than children to survive 8 relatively common types of cancer, according to a long-running study of cancer survival across Europe.
The study showed that AYAs had significantly worse survival rates than children if they were diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), and 4 types of solid tumor malignancies.
The study’s authors say that variations in survival between age groups are due to a number of factors, including delays in diagnosis and treatment, a lack of treatment guidelines and clinical trials specifically for AYAs, and differences in the biology of some cancers.
“The good news is that the number of children, adolescents, and young adults surviving for at least 5 years after diagnosis has risen steadily over time in Europe,” said author Annalisa Trama, PhD, of The National Institute of Cancer (Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori: Fondazione IRCCS) in Milan, Italy.
“Across all cancers, the level of improvement is similar in these age groups. This contrasts with earlier results that adolescents and young adults diagnosed up to the 1990s were lagging behind children in terms of survival.”
“However, we found that adolescents and young adults still tend to die earlier than children for several cancers common to these age groups, particularly blood cancers like leukemias and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.”
Dr Trama and her colleagues reported these findings in The Lancet Oncology.
The researchers compared survival between AYAs (ages 15 to 39), children (ages 0 to 14), and adults (ages 40 to 69) who were diagnosed from 2000 to 2007 and followed up to at least 2008.
The team analyzed data from population-based cancer registries covering all or part of 27 European countries* and estimated 5-year survival for 56,505 cancer cases in children; 312,483 in AYAs; and 3,567,383 in adults. The researchers also analyzed changes in survival over time from 1999 to 2007.
For AYAs, survival at 5 years from diagnosis for all cancers combined was 82% for 2005-2007, which is up from 79% for 1999-2001 (P<0.0001). In children, survival improved from 76% to 79% over the same time period (P<0.0001).
Survival improved significantly in children and AYAs for ALL (P<0.0001) and NHL (P<0.0001 in AYAs and P=0.023 in children). On the other hand, between 1999 and 2007, survival rates remained unchanged for AYAs with AML (around 50%).
Overall, AYAs had slightly better 5-year survival than children because they were diagnosed more often with cancers with fairly good prognoses—Hodgkin lymphoma, NHL, germ cell tumors, melanoma, thyroid cancer, and breast cancer.
However, the overall survival rates conceal differences between specific cancers. Survival was significantly worse for AYAs than for children when it came to 8 relatively common cancers affecting both age groups:
- ALL—55.6% for AYAs and 85.8% for children (P<0.0001)
- AML—49.8% and 60.5%, respectively (P<0.0001)
- Hodgkin lymphoma—92.9% and 95.1%, respectively (P<0.0001)
- NHL—77.4% and 83.0%, respectively (P<0.0001)
- Astrocytomas—46.4% and 61.9%, respectively (P<0.0001)
- Ewing’s sarcoma of bone—49.3% and 66.6%, respectively (P<0.0001)
- Rhabdomyosarcoma—37.8% and 66.6%, respectively (P<0.0001)
- Osteosarcoma—61.5% and 66.8%, respectively (P=0.011).
AYAs had a survival advantage over adults for almost all major cancers affecting both age groups, supporting the idea that younger patients with few other illnesses are likely to fare better than older patients.
There are only 2 types of cancer for which AYAs were at a survival disadvantage—breast (83.5% vs 87.0%) and prostate (79.9% vs 89.8%).
Dr Trama and her colleagues pointed out that this analysis pre-dates recent initiatives to improve outcomes for AYAs that have been implemented in several European countries.
“The European Network for Teenagers and Young Adults with Cancer is advocating collaboration between pediatric and adult oncologists, greater access to clinical trials and research to improve treatments for this specific age group, as well as developing adolescent and young adult-specific practice guidelines, encouraging healthier lifestyles and the greater involvement of patients and patients support groups,” Dr Trama said.
“This study will provide an important starting point from which to evaluate whether these initiatives will reduce the gulf in survival between European adolescents and young adults and children with cancer.”
*Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, England, Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland, Croatia, Italy, Malta, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and Slovakia