From the Journals

Restrictive fluids tied to kidney injury after major abdominal surgery

View on the News

Trial supports “modestly liberal” fluids

Effective blinding was impossible in this randomized study, wrote Birgitte Brandstrup, PhD, in an accompanying editorial. Differences in fluid volume cause symptoms that clinicians can easily identify, she noted.

She recalled the 1990s, when “surgical patients received so much intravenous saline on the day of surgery that they often gained 4 to 6 kg, and by postoperative day 2 or 3, [and] pulmonary congestion and cardiac arrhythmias were commonplace.” Subsequent trials changed this practice, and patients in the current study received much less fluid than they would have in the old days, she noted.

Nonetheless, the findings indicate “that physiologic principles remain valid: Both hypovolemia and oliguria must be recognized and treated with fluid.” While that does not justify excessive perioperative fluid therapy, “a modestly liberal fluid regimen is safer than a truly restrictive regimen.”

Dr. Brandstrup is with the department of surgery at Holbaek (Denmark) Hospital. She reported having no relevant conflicts of interest. These comments recap her editorial (New Engl J Med. 2018 May 10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1805615).


 

FROM THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE


Funders included the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), the Health Research Council of New Zealand, the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists, and Monash University, Melbourne. Dr. Myles reported receiving grant support from NHMRC. He had no other disclosures.

SOURCE: Myles PS et al. New Engl J Med. 2018 May 10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801601.

Pages

Next Article: