Cases That Test Your Skills

Seeing snakes that aren’t there

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

TREATMENT Discontinuation and re-challenge

After 3 days, we discontinue OROS methylphenidate. Five days after discontinuation, R’s visual hallucinations and aggressive behaviors completely resolve. After not receiving stimulants for 2 weeks, R is restarted on short-acting methylphenidate, 5 mg/d, because he had a relatively good clinical response to short-acting methylphenidate previously. After 14 days, the short-acting methylphenidate dosage is increased to 5 mg twice daily without the re-emergence of psychosis or aggressive behaviors.

The authors’ observations

Although stimulant-induced psychosis can be a disturbing adverse effect, severe ADHD greatly affects a person’s functioning at school and at home and can lead to several comorbidities, including depression, anxiety, and substance abuse. For these reasons, most patients with ADHD who experience psychotic symptoms are re-challenged with stimulants.10 Out of the 14 cases discussed above, 4 patients were restarted on the same stimulant or a different ADHD medication; 2 of them had the same psychotic symptoms days after the reintroduction of the drug and the other 2 had no recurrence.10,12,13

Stimulant-induced hallucinations

The emergence of hallucinations with methylphenidate or amphetamines has been attributed to a chronic increase of dopamine levels in the synaptic cleft, while the pathophysiological mechanisms are not clearly known. In some cases, hallucinations emerged after taking the first low dose, which has been thought to be an effect of idiosyncratic mechanism. Stimulants cause an increase of the releasing of catecholamines. Porfirio et al14 argue that high-dose stimulants can deteriorate the response to visual stimuli, causing a different perception of visual stimuli in susceptible children, based on the information that norepinephrine is released in the lateral geniculate nucleus, and it increases the transmission of visual information.

An idiosyncratic drug reaction

Despite the existence of many theories on the pathophysiology of stimulant-induced psychosis (Box15-18), its actual mechanism remains unknown. In R’s case, given the speed with which his symptoms developed, the proposed mechanisms of action may not explain his psychotic symptoms. We must consider an idiosyncratic drug reaction as an explanation. This suggestion is supported by the fact that re-challenging with a stimulant did not re-induce psychosis in 2 out of the 4 cases described in the literature,10,12,13 as well as in R’s case.

Box

The pathophysiology of stimulant-induced psychosis

Although the subjective effects of methylphenidate and amphetamines are similar, neurochemical effects of the 2 stimulants are distinct, with different mechanisms of action. Methylphenidate targets the dopamine transporter (DAT) and the noradrenaline transporter (NET), inhibiting DA and NA reuptake, and therefore increasing DA and NA levels in the synaptic cleft. Amphetamine targets DAT and NET, inhibiting DA and NA reuptake, and therefore increasing DA and NA levels in the synaptic cleft. It also enters the presynaptic neuron, preventing DA/NA from storing in the vesicles. In addition, it promotes the release of catecholamines from vesicles into the cytosol and ultimately from the cytosol into the synaptic cleft.18

Generally, amphetamines are twice as potent as methylphenidate. As such, lower doses of amphetamine preparations can cause psychotic symptoms when compared with methamphetamine products.17 Griffith15 showed that paranoia manifested itself in all participants who were previously healthy as they underwent repeated administration of 5 to 15 mg of oral dextroamphetamine many times per day for up to 5 days in a row, leading to cumulative doses ranging from 200 to 800 mg.15 At such doses, the effects are similar to those obtained with illicit use of methamphetamine, a drug of abuse for which psychosis-inducing effects are well documented.

Psychosis in reaction to therapeutic doses of methylphenidate may have a mechanism of action that is shared by psychosis in response to chronic use of methamphetamine. Several hypotheses have been suggested to explain the mechanism behind stimulantinduced psychosis in cases of chronic methamphetamine use:

  • Young,16 who had one of the first proposed theories in 1981, hypothesized attributing symptoms to dose-related effects at pre- and post-synaptic noradrenergic and dopaminergic receptors.
  • Hsieh et al18 hypothesized that methamphetamine use causes an increased flow of dopamine in the striatum, which leads to excessive glutamate release into the cortex. Excess glutamate in the cortex might, over time, cause damage to cortical interneurons. This damage may dysregulate thalamocortical signals, resulting in psychotic symptoms.18

Although the mechanisms by which psychotic symptoms associated with stimulants occur remain unknown, possibilities include10,19:

  • genetic predisposition
  • changes induced by stimulants at the level of neurotransmitters, synapses, and brain circuits
  • an idiosyncratic drug reaction.

Continue to: What to consider before prescribing stimulants

Pages

Next Article: