Cardiac impacts of seasonal time change
Muhammad Adeel Rishi, MD, a sleep specialist at Mayo Clinic, Eau Claire, Wis., and lead author of the AASM position statement, highlighted cardiovascular risks in a written statement for this article, noting increased rates of heart attack following the spring time change, and a higher risk of atrial fibrillation.
Dr. Muhammad Adeel Rishi
“Mayo Clinic has not taken a position on this issue,” Dr. Rishi noted. Still, he advocated for permanent standard time as the author of the AASM position statement and vice chair of the AASM public safety committee.
Jay Chudow, MD, and Andrew K. Krumerman, MD, of Montefiore Medical Center, New York, lead author and principal author, respectively, of a recent study that reported increased rates of atrial fibrillation admissions after DST transitions, had the same stance.
Dr. Jay Chudow
“We support elimination of seasonal time changes from a health perspective,” they wrote in a joint comment. “There is mounting evidence of a negative health impact with these seasonal time changes related to effects on sleep and circadian rhythm. Our work found the spring change was associated with more admissions for atrial fibrillation. This added to prior evidence of increased cardiovascular events related to these time changes. If physicians counsel patients on reducing risk factors for disease, shouldn’t we do the same as a society?”
Pros and cons
Not all sleep experts are convinced. Mary Jo Farmer, MD, PhD, FCCP, a sleep specialist and director of pulmonary hypertension services at Baystate Medical Center, and assistant professor of medicine at the University of Massachusetts, Springfield, considers perspectives from both sides of the issue.
Dr. Mary Jo Farmer
“Daylight saving time promotes active lifestyles as people engage in more outdoor activities after work and school, [and] daylight saving time produces economic and safety benefits to society as retail revenues are higher and crimes are lower,” Dr. Farmer said. “Alternatively, moving the clocks forward is a cost burden to the U.S. economy when health issues, decreased productivity, and workplace injuries are considered.”
If one time system is permanently established, Dr. Farmer anticipates divided opinions from patients with sleep issues, regardless of which system is chosen.
“I can tell you, I have a cohort of sleep patients who prefer more evening light and look forward to the spring time change to daylight saving time,” she said. “However, they would not want the sun coming up at 9:00 a.m. in the winter months if we stayed on daylight saving time year-round. Similarly, patients would not want the sun coming up at 4:00 a.m. on the longest day of the year if we stayed on standard time all year round.”
Dr. Farmer called for more research before a decision is made.
“I suggest we need more information about the dangers of staying on daylight saving or standard time year-round because perhaps the current strategy of keeping morning light consistent is not so bad,” she said.
Time for a Congressional hearing?
According to Dr. Ramar, the time is now for a Congressional hearing, as lawmakers and the public need to be adequately informed when considering new legislation.
“There are public misconceptions about daylight saving time and standard time,” Dr. Ramar said. “People often like the idea of daylight saving time because they think it provides more light, and they dislike the concept of standard time because they think it provides more darkness. The reality is that neither time system provides more light or darkness than the other; it is only the timing that changes.”
Until new legislation is introduced, Dr. Ramar offered some practical advice for navigating seasonal time shifts.
“Beginning 2-3 days before the time change, it can be helpful to gradually adjust sleep and wake times, as well as other daily routines such as meal times,” he said. “After the time change, going outside for some morning light can help adjust the timing of your internal body clock.”
The investigators reported no conflicts of interest.