Sy Atezaz Saeed, MD, MS Professor and Chair Emeritus Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine Greenville, North Carolina
Daniel John Majarwitz, MD PGY-2 Resident Internal Medicine and Psychiatry Combined Program Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine Greenville, North Carolina
Disclosures The authors report no financial relationships with any companies whose products are mentioned in this article, or with manufacturers of competing products.
2. Christensen MC, Loft H, Florea I, et al. Efficacy of vortioxetine in working patients with generalized anxiety disorder. CNS Spectr. 2019;24(2):249-257. doi:10.1017/S1092852917000761
Vortioxetine, an FDA-approved antidepressant, has been shown to improve anxiety symptoms in patients with GAD. Additionally, vortioxetine has shown positive effects in patients with MDD, with greater improvement seen in the working and professional population. Due to the overlap between MDD and GAD, Christensen et al13 assessed the effectiveness of vortioxetine on anxiety symptoms in individuals who were working.
Study design
Researchers conducted a post-hoc analysis of a previously completed randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 301 patients as well as a previously completed randomized, placebo-controlled relapse prevention study of 687 patients. Patients in both groups met DSM-IV-TR criteria for GAD.
Inclusion criteria included a Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) score ≥20 with HAM-A scores ≥2 on items 1 (anxious mood), and 2 (tension), and a Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score ≤16 at screening and baseline.
Researchers compared participants who were working or pursuing an education vs the full study sample.
Outcomes
Vortioxetine was significantly associated with benefits in anxiety symptoms, functioning, and quality of life in both working participants and the total population, with the greatest effects seen in professional (ie, managers, administrators) and associate professional (ie, technical, nursing, clerical workers, or secretarial) positions. Working participants who received placebo were more likely to relapse compared to those receiving vortioxetine.
There did not appear to be a statistically significant benefit or increase in relapse among the skilled labor group (ie, building, electrical/factory worker, or services/sales) while receiving vortioxetine.
Conclusions/limitations
Vortioxetine may have a more pronounced effect in patients who are working or pursuing an education vs the full GAD population, which suggests that targeting this medication at particular patient demographics may be beneficial.
Working patients with GAD may also differ from nonworking patients by factors other than work, such as education, support system, motivation, and other personal factors.
This study was a post-hoc analysis, which limits definitive conclusions but may help guide future studies.