Evidence-Based Reviews

Using apps in clinical practice: 8 studies

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

COVID-19’s increased demand on the mental health care delivery system led to expanded utilization of technology-based solutions, including digital tools to deliver care.1 Technology-based solutions include both synchronous telehealth (eg, real-time interactive audio/video visits) and asynchronous tools such as smartphone applications (apps). Both real-time telehealth and apps continue to gain popularity. More than 10,000 mental health–related apps are available, and that number continues to rise.2 Numerous web- or mobile-based apps are available to aid in the treatment of various psychiatric conditions, including generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), major depressive disorder, insomnia, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Clinicians may find it challenging to choose the best psychiatry-related apps to recommend to patients. This dilemma calls for an approach to help clinicians select apps that are safe and effective.2 The American Psychiatric Association provides information to help mental health professionals navigate these issues and identify which aspects to consider when selecting an app for clinical use.3 The M-Health Index and Navigation Database also provides a set of objective evaluative criteria and offers guidance on choosing apps.4

In this article, we review 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of mental health–related apps. We took several steps to ensure the RCTs we included were impactful and meaningful. First, we conducted a general search using mainstream search engines to assess which psychiatric apps were most popular for use in clinical practice. Using this list, we conducted a scholarly search engine query of RCTs using the name of the apps as a search parameter along with the following keywords: “mobile,” “web,” “applications,” and “psychiatry.” This search yielded approximately 50 results, which were narrowed down based on content and interest to a list of 8 articles (Table5-12). These articles were then graded using the limitations of each study as the primary substrate for evaluation.

Using apps in clinical practice: 8 studies

1. Linardon J, Shatte A, Rosato J, et al. Efficacy of a transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral intervention for eating disorder psychopathology delivered through a smartphone app: a randomized controlled trial. Psychol Med. 2022;52(9):1679-1690. doi:10.1017/S0033291720003426

Many patients with eating disorders are unable to receive effective treatment due to problems with accessing health care. Smartphone apps may help bridge the treatment gap for patients in this position. Linardon et al5 developed an app that uses the principles of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for treating eating disorders and conducted this study to evaluate its effectiveness.

Study design

  • This RCT assigned individuals who reported episodes of binge eating to a group that used a mobile app (n = 197) or to a waiting list (n = 195). At baseline, 42% of participants exhibited diagnostic-level symptoms of bulimia nervosa and 31% had symptoms of binge-eating disorder.
  • Assessments took place at baseline, Week 4, and Week 8.
  • The primary outcome was global levels of eating disorder psychopathology.
  • Secondary outcomes were other eating disorder symptoms, impairment, and distress.

Outcomes

  • Compared to the control group, participants who used the mobile app reported greater reductions in global eating disorder psychopathology (d = -0.80).
  • Significant effects were also observed for secondary outcomes except compensatory behavior frequency.
  • Overall, participants reported they were satisfied with the app.

Continue to: Conclusions/limitations

Pages

Next Article: