Americans with depression turn to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) more often than conventional psychotherapy or FDA-approved medication. In a nationally representative sample, 54% of respondents with self-reported “severe depression”—including two-thirds of those receiving conventional therapies—reported using CAM during the previous 12 months.1
Unfortunately, popular acceptance of CAM for depression is disproportionate to the evidence base, which—although growing—remains limited. As a result, your patients may be self-medicating with poorly supported treatments that are unlikely to help them recover from depression.
In reviewing CAM treatments for depression, we found some with enough evidence of positive effect that we feel comfortable recommending them as evidence-based options. These promising, short-term treatments are supported by level 1a or 1b evidence and at least 1 study that demonstrates an ability to induce remission ( Table 1 ).2
For patients seeking “natural” or nonprescription treatments—or when you wish to augment standard treatments that are not working adequately—you might recommend fatty acids, St. John’s wort, or S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe). Similar recommendations can be made for yoga, exercise, and bibliotherapy, as we discuss here.
Table 1
Evidence these authors required to recommend a CAM treatment
Minimum requirements | Level of evidence | Recommendation |
---|---|---|
Systematic review showing superiority to placebo or standard treatment Plus 1 study showing CAM treatment can induce remission | 1a + | A |
At least 2 RCTs showing superiority to placebo or standard treatment Plus 1 study showing CAM treatment can induce remission | 1b | A– |
CAM: complementary and alternative medicine; RCT: randomized controlled trial | ||
Source: Reference 2 |
Reviewing CAM evidence
This article refers to as “alternative” any treatment other than a form of psychotherapy or an FDA-approved medication that substitutes for a standard psychiatric treatment. When used to augment standard psychiatric treatments, these approaches are considered “complementary.”
Our search for evidence on CAM treatments for depressive disorders raised questions about what constitutes acceptable and convincing methodology:
- Studies often had problems with blinding and suitable placebos. Many were small, with short duration and no long-term follow-up.
- Comparisons with active treatments that showed no differences were assumed to imply comparability, even though the studies were powered to detect only large differences.
Applying the evidence. Because CAM use is widespread, be sure to ask psychiatric patients if they are using CAM treatments. If the answer is “yes,” a risk-benefit assessment is needed. Inform patients who are using poorly supported CAM approaches that they could consider better-supported CAM options as well as standard effective antidepressants.
Monitor patients for an adequately prompt positive response to an evidence-based CAM approach that has shown efficacy for their level of depression. As with any treatment, consider other evidence-based options when CAM treatments are inadequate or unsuccessful in achieving remission of depressive symptoms.
Sufficient evidence of efficacy
Yoga. In their systematic review of yoga’s effectiveness for depression, Pilkington et al3 analyzed 5 RCTs that met 3 criteria:
- participants had mild to severe depression or depressive disorders
- yoga or yoga-based exercises alone were used for treatment
- depression rating scales were used as outcome measures.
Conclusion. Yoga has been studied primarily as an alternative treatment, but its physical health and group participation benefits and lack of side effects make it a suitable complementary treatment as well.
- 45% with supervised exercise
- 40% with home-based exercise
- 47% with sertraline, 50 to 200 mg/d
- 31% with placebo.4
5 RCTs of yoga’s effectiveness in treating depression
RCT | Interventions | Conclusion |
---|---|---|
Broota and Dhir, 1990 | Yoga and PMR vs control | Yoga and PMR were more effective than control, with yoga more effective than PMR |
Khumar et al, 1993 | Shavasana yoga vs no intervention | College students with severe depression improved during and after yoga treatment |
Janakiramaiah et al, 2000 | SKY vs ECT vs imipramine | Reductions in BDI scores for all 3 groups; ECT > SKY or imipramine, SKY=imipramine |
Rohini et al, 2000 | Full SKY vs partial SKY | 30 individuals with MDD improved with either therapy, but results were not statistically significant |
Woolery, 2004 | Iyengar yoga vs wait list | 28 mildly depressed individuals benefitted from yoga, as measured by BDI scores at midpoint and throughout treatment |
BDI: Beck Depression Inventory; ECT: electroconvulsive therapy; MDD: major depressive disorder; PMR: progressive muscle relaxation; RCT: randomized controlled trial; SKY: Sudarshan Kriya yoga | ||
Source: Broota A, Dhir R. Efficacy of two relaxation techniques in depression. Journal of Personality and Clinical Studies. 1990;6(1):83-90. Khumar SS, Kaur P, Kaur S. Effectiveness of Shavasana on depression among university students. Indian J Clin Psychol. 1993;20(2):82-87. Janakiramaiah N, Gangadhar BN, Naga Venkatesha Murthy PJ, et al. Antidepressant efficacy of Sudarshan Kriya yoga (SKY) in melancholia: a randomized comparison with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and imipramine. J Affect Disord. 2000;57(1-3):255-259. Rohini V, Pandey RS, Janakiramaiah N, et al. A comparative study of full and partial Sudarshan Kriya yoga (SKY) in major depressive disorder. NIMHANS Journal. 2000;18(1):53-57. Woolery A, Myers H, Sternlieb B, et al. A yoga intervention for young adults with elevated symptoms of depression. Altern Ther Health Med. 2004;10(2):60-63. |