Case Letter

Graft-vs-host Disease and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Author and Disclosure Information

Practice Points

  • Graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare life-threatening complications seen in patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
  • Although mild acute GVHD easily is distinguished from TEN, severe acute GVHD and TEN share overlapping features and present a diagnostic challenge.
  • Therapeutic decisions and associated outcomes hinge on accurate diagnosis, as high-dose systemic corticosteroids have been associated with higher mortality rates in TEN.


 

References

To the Editor:

Acute graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) remains a limitation to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in 20% to 50% of patients after transplant. Furthermore, failed treatment with corticosteroids is frequent and portends a poor prognosis.1 Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is an epidermolytic skin disorder thought to represent an adverse drug reaction, though its pathogenesis remains unclear. Severe forms of acute GVHD can mimic TEN clinically and histologically. Both can present with widespread cutaneous and mucosal bullae, erosions, and desquamation. Toxic epidermal necrolysis in the context of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is extremely rare, with almost 100% mortality in adult patients. Features that favor acute GVHD over TEN include diarrhea, elevation in bilirubin level, and chimerism.2 However, these features might be absent, posing a therapeutic dilemma, as current treatment preferences for each of these entities differ.

Growing evidence supports the use of anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α drugs for the treatment of TEN. Success has been reported with both anti–TNF-α monoclonal antibodies as well as the soluble fusion protein etanercept.3,4 The use of TNF-α inhibitors in acute GVHD remains anecdotal.

Desquamation and erosions involving the face as well as the oral and nasal mucosae

FIGURE 1. Desquamation and erosions involving the face as well as the oral and nasal mucosae (patient 1).

A 58-year-old man (patient 1) with a history of acute myelogenous leukemia presented with a pruritic morbilliform eruption 28 days after HSCT. There was no desquamation or mucosal involvement and the biopsy obtained was histologically suggestive of grade 2 acute GVHD. His immunosuppressive regimen included sirolimus and cyclophosphamide. He was receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), voriconazole, and acyclovir for infectious prophylaxis. At the time of presentation, he was treated with high-dose systemic steroids (prednisone 2 mg/kg/d) for acute GVHD with partial improvement. Upon tapering of the steroids 3 weeks after initiating TMP-SMX and 1 week after initiating voriconazole, he developed painful desquamation and erosions involving 95% of the body surface area (BSA), necessitating admission to the local burn unit (Figure 1). Biopsies demonstrated full-thickness epidermal necrosis with subepidermal blistering and interface dermatitis (Figure 2). No gastrointestinal tract involvement of acute GVHD was noted. The patient was a 100% donor chimera, supporting the diagnosis of acute GVHD; however, the patient and donor carried the HLA-C*06:02 allele, which previously has been described in association with TMP-SMX–related Stevens-Johnson syndrome/TEN.5 In addition, causality assessment using the algorithm of drug causality for epidermal necrolysis indicated TMP-SMX as a probable cause and voriconazole as a possible cause. The diagnosis of TEN with a SCORe of Toxic Epidermal Necrosis (SCORTEN) of 4 in the setting of acute GVHD was favored, though grade 4 acute GVHD could not be excluded. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was discontinued, and voriconazole was changed to posaconazole. He received supportive care along with 1 dose of 25-mg subcutaneous etanercept and 3 days of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Skin re-epithelialization was complete by 3 weeks. At 4 weeks, the patient developed a new asymptomatic erythematous eruption. Biopsies demonstrated changes of acute and chronic GVHD (Figure 3) that resolved with up-titration of sirolimus. The patient remained hospitalized for 96 days and continued to follow up with his transplant team as well as ophthalmology and dermatology. He died 2 years after HSCT.

Histopathology revealed full-thickness epidermal necrosis suggesting toxic epidermal necrolysis or grade 4 acute graft-vs-host disease

FIGURE 2. Histopathology revealed full-thickness epidermal necrosis suggesting toxic epidermal necrolysis or grade 4 acute graft-vs-host disease (patient 1)(H&E, original magnification ×200).

A 67-year-old woman (patient 2) with high-grade myelodysplastic syndrome presented with an erythematous morbilliform eruption on the torso on day 20 after a matched unrelated HSCT that histologically was consistent with grade 2 GVHD (Figure 4). She had been receiving sirolimus and tacrolimus for GVHD prophylaxis. Infectious prophylaxis included acyclovir, pentamidine, micafungin, and TMP-SMX. Despite high-dose systemic steroids, the rash progressed and ultimately involved 80% BSA. A positive Nikolsky sign was noted involving 21% BSA (Figure 5), in addition to oral and genital mucosal ulcers. She denied nausea, vomiting, fever, or diarrhea. Chimerism studies were negative. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was discontinued, and she was transferred to a burn unit. Biopsies showed full-thickness epidermal necrosis. A diagnosis of TEN with a SCORTEN of 4 in the setting of acute GVHD was favored; grade 4 acute GVHD could not be excluded. Steroids were discontinued. Because laboratory studies indicated IgA deficiency, IVIG was not considered as a systemic option for therapy. The patient received 1 dose of infliximab (5 mg/kg). Cyclophosphamide 1600 mg weekly was added for GVHD therapy. The wounds progressively healed, and 2 weeks into her admission she was noted to have only 3% BSA with denuded skin. The patient was transferred to the cancer treatment center for further management of the malignancy. Unfortunately, after 2 months she died due to ischemic colitis that was confirmed on autopsy.

Vacuolar interface with scattered necrotic keratinocytes within an acanthotic epidermis with hyperkeratosis and wedge-shaped hypergranulosis

FIGURE 3. Four weeks after treatment, histopathology revealed a vacuolar interface with scattered necrotic keratinocytes within an acanthotic epidermis with hyperkeratosis and wedge-shaped hypergranulosis (patient 1)(H&E, original magnification ×200).

Graft-vs-host disease and TEN are rare, life-threatening complications seen in patients with allogeneic HSCT.2 Graft-vs-host disease and TEN share clinicopathologic characteristics and effector immune mechanisms, largely the substantial role of T-cell activation and tissue destruction, which occur through mediators such as TNF-α.6-8

Morbilliform exanthem without desquamation

FIGURE 4. Morbilliform exanthem without desquamation (patient 2).

Given the sparse lymphocytic infiltrate, keratinocyte death in TEN is thought to result from soluble molecules, including TNF-α and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand.9 Tumor necrosis factor α has been identified in blister fluid, biopsy specimens, and serum of patients with TEN. Tumor necrosis factor α increases the expression of keratinocyte-inducible nitric oxide synthase, which upregulates keratinocyte Fas ligand expression and subsequent Fas- and caspase-8–mediated keratinocyte cell death.10

The rash evolved to full-thickness epidermal detachment within 48 hours

FIGURE 5. The rash evolved to full-thickness epidermal detachment within 48 hours (patient 2).

Acute GVHD results from donor lymphocyte activation after infusion into damaged recipient tissues that previously have been radiated or chemoablated. Mismatches in histocompatibility complexes between donor cells and recipient tissue antigens serve as the initial trigger for immune activation. Activation of antigen-presenting cells followed by activation, proliferation, differentiation, and migration of donor T cells ultimately results in destruction of the target tissue.11 Immune mediators, such as TNF-α and lymphotoxin α (another member of the TNF superfamily), play a nonredundant role in the pathogenesis of GVHD.12

Pages

Next Article: