Clinical Edge

Summaries of Must-Read Clinical Literature, Guidelines, and FDA Actions

Using ASCO Value Framework for Ovarian Ca Options

J Oncol Pract; ePub 2017 Oct 10; Foote, et al

Value snapshots of 3 frontline treatment options for ovarian cancer were constructed using the ASCO value framework in a recent study. Investigators looked at trials that evaluated 1) dose-dense paclitaxel, 2) intraperitoneal (IP)/intravenous (IV) chemotherapy, or 3) concurrent plus maintenance bevacizumab. They used the ASCO value framework to calculate net health benefit (NHB) relative to drug-acquisition cost. Among the results:

  • NHB of dose-dense paclitaxel received 38 NHB points (out of a maximum of 180) at an additional cost of $16/cycle.
  • IP cisplatin/IV + IP paclitaxel received 29 points at an additional cost of $1,629/cycle.
  • Concurrent plus maintenance bevacizumab as used in the Gynecologic Oncology Group study received 24 points at an additional cost of $7,581/cycle.
  • This same treatment as used in the Seventh International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm study received 6 points at an additional cost of $3,790/cycle.
  • The NHB points-to-dollar ratios were 2.4, 0.018, and 0.003, respectively.

Citation:

Foote J, Secord A, Liang M, Cohn D, Jewell E, Havrilesky L. ASCO value framework highlights the relative value of treatment options in ovarian cancer. [Published online ahead of print October 10, 2017]. J Oncol Pract. doi:10.1200/JOP.2017.025106.