Summaries of Must-Read Clinical Literature, Guidelines, and FDA Actions
Using ASCO Value Framework for Ovarian Ca Options
J Oncol Pract; ePub 2017 Oct 10; Foote, et al
Value snapshots of 3 frontline treatment options for ovarian cancer were constructed using the ASCO value framework in a recent study. Investigators looked at trials that evaluated 1) dose-dense paclitaxel, 2) intraperitoneal (IP)/intravenous (IV) chemotherapy, or 3) concurrent plus maintenance bevacizumab. They used the ASCO value framework to calculate net health benefit (NHB) relative to drug-acquisition cost. Among the results:
- NHB of dose-dense paclitaxel received 38 NHB points (out of a maximum of 180) at an additional cost of $16/cycle.
- IP cisplatin/IV + IP paclitaxel received 29 points at an additional cost of $1,629/cycle.
- Concurrent plus maintenance bevacizumab as used in the Gynecologic Oncology Group study received 24 points at an additional cost of $7,581/cycle.
- This same treatment as used in the Seventh International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm study received 6 points at an additional cost of $3,790/cycle.
- The NHB points-to-dollar ratios were 2.4, 0.018, and 0.003, respectively.
Foote J, Secord A, Liang M, Cohn D, Jewell E, Havrilesky L. ASCO value framework highlights the relative value of treatment options in ovarian cancer. [Published online ahead of print October 10, 2017]. J Oncol Pract. doi:10.1200/JOP.2017.025106.