Clinical Review

What You Can Do To Improve Adult Immunization Rates

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Practices that don’t have an electronic health record can still improve vaccination rates by conveying the reminder with a brightly colored paper form attached to the front of a patient’s chart during the check-in process. One recent study showed that this approach increased rates of influenza vaccination in an urban practice by 12 percentage points.27

Furthermore, simply reminding patients to vaccinate increases the vaccination rate.28 Patient reminder/recall systems using telephone calls or mailings (phone calls are more effective than mailings) improve both childhood and adult vaccinations in all medical settings. More intensive systems using multiple reminders appear to be more effective than single reminders, and while costly, the benefits of increasing preventive visits/services and vaccine uptake help offset this cost.28

5. Implement standing orders. Standing orders—which allow nurses and other appropriately trained health care personnel to assess immunization status and administer vaccinations according to protocol—help improve immunization rates.29 ACIP advises that standing order programs be used in long-term care facilities under the supervision of a medical director to ensure the administration of recommended vaccinations for adults, and in inpatient and outpatient facilities. Because of the societal burden of influenza and pneumococcal disease, implementation of standing orders programs to improve adult vaccination coverage for these diseases is considered a national public health priority.30

6. Develop an encouraging communication style. Studies show that how one communicates with patients is just as important as what one communicates. Certain communication styles and techniques may be more or less effective when discussing vaccination needs with some patients, especially those with vaccine hesitancy or low confidence in vaccine safety or effectiveness. For example, styles that are “directing” are usually unhelpful in addressing concerns about vaccination. These styles typically use information and persuasion to achieve change and may be perceived as confrontational. This approach can lead to cues being missed, jargon being used, and vaccine safety being overstated.

Styles shown to be helpful are those that elicit patient concerns, ask permission to discuss, acknowledge/listen/empathize, determine readiness to change, inform about benefits and risks, and give appropriate resources. These helpful forms of communication are more of a “May I help you?” style vs a “This is what you should do” style of communication.31

Telling a patient that vaccines are safe and, “You are silly not to get yours” is not as effective as saying, “What are your concerns about vaccines? Let’s talk about them.”

Assure patients that recommendations are based on the best interest of their health and on the best available science. Listen to a patient’s concerns and acknowledge them in a nonconfrontational manner, allowing patients to express their concerns and thereby increase their willingness to listen.32 Saying that there is “absolutely no need to worry—vaccines are safe and you are silly not to get yours” is not as effective as saying, “What are your concerns regarding vaccines? Let’s talk about them.”

For the vaccine-hesitant group, building trust is essential through a respectful, nonjudgmental approach that aims to elicit and address specific concerns. For those who refuse vaccines, keep the consultation brief, keep the door open for further discussion, and provide appropriate resources if the patient wants them.33

Increase use of new media

Mass communication through smartphones and other Internet-based tools such as Facebook and Twitter brings a new dimension to health care, allowing patients and health professionals to communicate about health issues and possibly improve health outcomes.34 The number of people using social media increased by almost 570% worldwide between 2000 and 2012 and surpassed 2.75 billion in 2013.35

Sixty-one percent of adults in the United States look online for health information.36 In a survey conducted in September 2014, the Pew Research Center found that Facebook is the most popular social media site in the United States. Seventy-one percent of online-knowledgeable adults use Facebook, and multiplatform use is on the rise: 52% of adult Internet users now use 2 or more social media sites, a significant increase from 2013, when it stood at 42%. (Other platforms such as Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest, and LinkedIn saw significant increases over the past year in the proportion of online adults who use them).37

One RCT showed that patient access to a personalized Web-based portal increased influenza vaccination rates.

Health information provided by social media can answer medical questions and concerns and enhance health promotion and education.35 A recent review of 98 research studies provided evidence that social media can create a space to share, comment, and discuss health information.34 Compared with traditional communication methods, the widespread availability of social media makes health information more accessible, broadening access to various population groups, regardless of age, education, race, ethnicity, and locale.

Pages

Next Article: