HelpDesk

Is an intestinal biopsy necessary when the blood work suggests celiac disease?

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

A 2013 retrospective study of 2477 symptomatic adults (older than 18 years) who received diagnostic testing for celiac disease at 2 academic institutions in Cleveland, Ohio, evaluated the predictive value of IgA anti-tTG and EMA. Of the patients, 610 (25%) had abnormal serologic tests, and 240 (39%) underwent endoscopy with biopsy.

A total of 50 patients (21%) had biopsy results consistent with celiac disease, defined as a Marsh 3 lesion or greater.3 An IgA anti-tTG level of 118 U/mL (5.9-fold the upper limit of normal on the test) had a positive predictive value of 86.4% with a false-positive value of 2%. An EMA titer greater than 1:160 when IgA anti-tTG was between 21 and 118 U/mL had a positive predictive value of 83%.

Antibody levels 10 times normal show 100% positive predictive value

A 2008 retrospective study of one manufacturer’s IgA anti-tTG serologic test sought to establish the serologic antibody level at which the positive predictive value was 100%.4 Overall, 148 people, 15 years and older, with a positive IgA anti-tTG before biopsy or within 21 days of biopsy were included.

Symptomatic patients with serologic levels of certain antibodies greater than 10 times the upper limits of normal may not need an intestinal biopsy to confirm the diagnosis of celiac disease.Of the patients biopsied, 139 (93%) had positive biopsies of Marsh 2 or greater and were diagnosed with celiac disease. Using a cut-off of 3.3 and 6.7 times the upper limit of normal, investigators calculated a positive predictive value of 95% and 98%, respectively.

A cut-off of 10 times the upper limit of normal or greater had a positive predictive value of 100%. The highest level of IgA anti-tTG in a patient who didn’t have celiac disease on biopsy was 7.3 times the upper limit of normal.

Pages

Evidence-based answers from the Family Physicians Inquiries Network

Next Article: