Applied Evidence

A guide to diagnosing and managing ascites in cirrhosis

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Calculating serum ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) is recommended as it has been shown to better characterize ascitic fluid than total protein-based tests.27 SAAG is calculated by subtracting the level of ascitic fluid albumin from serum albumin level (SAAG = serum albumin – ascitic fluid albumin). A SAAG ≥ 1.1 g/dL is consistent with portal hypertension,28 with approximately 97% accuracy.

After calculating SAAG, look at total protein levels in ascitic fluid. Total protein concentration ≥ 2.5 g/dL with SAAG ≥ 1.1 g/dL has a 78.3% diagnostic accuracy in determining heart failure as the cause of ascites, with a sensitivity of 53.3% and specificity of 86.7%.28 On the other hand, a value of total protein < 2.5 g/dL indicates cirrhosis, liver failure, or acute hepatitis as the cause of fluid build-up.29 Stepwise evaluation of SAAG and total protein and how they can point toward the most likely cause of ascites is presented in FIGURE 2.27-29

Using SAAG and total protein level to determine the cause of ascites

Management

Noninvasive measures

Sodium restriction. The aim of treatment for uncomplicated clinically apparent ascites is sodium restriction and removal of fluid from the body. Dietary salt restriction is complicated, and care should be taken to properly educate patients. Salt restriction advised in the literature has shifted from a strict measure of < 2 g/d30 to more moderate strategies (described below).18

The 2 main reasons for this easing of restriction are issues with patient compliance and concerns about adverse effects with aggressive salt-restricted diets. One study assessing patient compliance with a salt-restricted diet found that more than two-thirds of the patients were noncompliant,31 and 65% of the patients incorrectly assumed they were following the plan, which suggests poor dietary education.31 Of the group that was compliant, 20% actually decreased their caloric intake, which can be detrimental in liver disease.31 Concerns have been raised that aggressive salt restriction along with diuretic use can lead to diuretic-induced hyponatremia and renal failure.32 Current European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) guidelines recommend salt restriction to a more moderate degree (80-120 mmol/d of sodium). This is equivalent to 4.9-6.9 g of salt (1 tablespoon is roughly equivalent to 6 g or 104 mmol of sodium).18

Diuretics. Initiation and dosage of diuretic therapy is a matter of some controversy. Historically, simultaneous ­administration of a loop diuretic and mineralocorticoid receptor blocker were recommended: 40 mg furosemide and 100 mg spironolactone, keeping the ratio constant with any dosage increases. This was based on a randomized controlled trial (RCT) showing that the combined diuretic therapy effectively mobilized ascites in a shorter period of time and with less frequent adverse effects (eg, hyperkalemia) compared with initial monotherapy.33

Continue to: On the other hand...

Pages

Next Article: