Missed dissecting aortic aneurysm proves fatal
A 43-YEAR-OLD MAN was admitted to the hospital complaining of severe chest pain, shortness of breath, sweating, and dry mouth. After being seen by several physicians, the patient suffered an aortic dissection, which caused bleeding in the wall of the aorta, an aortic rupture, and bleeding into the pericardium. He died 2 days later.
PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM The defendants failed to order tests to rule out a dissecting aortic aneurysm and did not include aortic dissection in the differential diagnosis. They failed to provide appropriate drug therapy to decrease cardiac impulse and lower the systolic blood pressure. They did not obtain an emergency cardiac consultation or admit the patient to a cardiovascular surgical intensive care unit.
THE DEFENSE The defendants denied negligence and claimed that nothing they did or failed to do contributed to the patient’s death.
VERDICT $250,000 Michigan settlement.
COMMENT Just yesterday, a malpractice lawyer presented me with a case very similar to this one: a patient with unexplained chest pain who died of a dissecting aneurysm. Remember, not all chest pain is caused by coronary artery disease.
Too-late cancer Dx blamed on neglected x-ray findings
A LONG-TERM CIGARETTE SMOKER IN HER 50s saw a physician in 2001 for symptoms of pneumonia. The doctor prescribed antibiotics and referred her to another facility for a chest radiograph.
Five days later, she returned to the physician’s office, where she was seen by another internist in the practice. The internist noted that the chest radiograph showed parenchymal densities in the right lung. Parenchymal densities had also showed up on 2 previous chest radiographs, but were more prevalent on the latest film. The internist advised the patient to finish her antibiotic regimen; he did not prescribe further tests or treatment.
Over the following 40 months, doctors in the patient’s medical group examined her 8 times. Each time she complained of impaired respiration. The internist believed that the symptoms were caused by asthma.
In 2004, the patient was diagnosed with stage IV cancer of the right lung, which had spread to her bones and was untreatable. She died several weeks later.
PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM A proper diagnosis in 2001 would have allowed the cancer to be cured. A computed tomography scan should have been performed and a pulmonologist consulted at that time.
THE DEFENSE Findings from the radiograph from 2001 did not necessitate further action. Because the patient’s cancer had metastasized before that radiograph, treatment then (or later) would not have changed the outcome.
VERDICT $850,000 New York verdict.
COMMENT Careful follow-up and diagnosis of chest radiograph abnormalities is paramount.
Yes, it was a stroke
WEAKNESS, NUMBNESS, AND TINGLING IN HIS RIGHT ARM prompted a 56-year-old man to visit his primary care physician. The physician sent the patient to the emergency department (ED) for testing because he believed the man was experiencing stroke-like symptoms. As the patient and his wife drove to the hospital, the physician faxed the patient’s medical records to the ED.
When the patient’s wife tried to give ED employees the physician’s orders for tests and tell them of the doctor’s concern about a stroke, they told her that all the beds were full and she should sit down and wait.
The patient was eventually evaluated as a low-priority patient with numbness in his right hand. The examining doctor ordered radiographs of the right wrist and discharged the patient with a diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.
Twenty minutes later, a nurse left a message telling the patient to return to the hospital for the stroke-related tests that had been ordered by his primary care physician. An ED physician other than the one who first examined the patient performed the tests—except for a test of blood flow to the brain. The physician diagnosed stroke-like symptoms and requested a consultation with another physician, which never happened. The patient was discharged about 6 hours after his first discharge.
About 16 hours later, the patient suffered a stroke. Subsequent testing revealed an obstruction in the left carotid artery. The stroke resulted in permanent neurologic injury.
PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM No information about the plaintiff’s claim is available.
THE DEFENSE The defendants denied negligence and disputed the extent of the patient’s injuries.
VERDICT $1.123 million Maryland verdict.
COMMENT Coordination of care remains critical, particularly between our outpatient offices and the busy ED.