TOPLINE:
, while those with uncomplicated diabetes had insignificantly worse cancer outcomes.
METHODOLOGY:
- This population-based retrospective cohort study used 2007-2015 data from the Taiwan Cancer Registry, which is linked to national insurance and death registry data.
- The analysis included 59,202 adults with stage I-III CRC who underwent potentially curative surgery: 44,944 without diabetes, 8,864 with uncomplicated diabetes, and 5,394 with complicated diabetes.
- The association between diabetes severity and CRC survival, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), time to recurrence, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was examined.
TAKEAWAY:
- Patients with uncomplicated diabetes had insignificantly worse OS (hazard ratio, 1.05), DFS (HR, 1.08), and CSS (HR, 0.98), compared with peers who did not have diabetes.
- Patients with complicated diabetes were at significantly higher risk of poor OS (HR, 1.85), DFS (HR, 1.75), and CSS (HR, 1.41), compared with those without diabetes.
- Patients with diabetes were also at higher risk for CRC recurrence than those without diabetes.
- Except for recurrence risk, the impact of complicated diabetes on CRC survival – that is, OS, DFS, and CSS – was more pronounced among women and those with early-stage cancer.
IN PRACTICE:
“These findings indicate that preventing diabetes complications may help improve survival in patients with CRC, especially [in] female patients and those in the early stages of the disease. Thus, a multidisciplinary approach is recommended for patients with CRC,” the authors conclude.
SOURCE:
The study, with first author Hsin-Yin Hsu, MD, National Taiwan University, Taipei, was published online in the journal Cancer.
LIMITATIONS:
Only patients from Taiwan were included, which limits generalizability, because CRC prognosis may vary in accordance with race or cancer treatment strategy – factors that may differ among countries. Data on glucose levels and diabetes duration were unavailable, potentially leading to misclassification of diabetes status.
DISCLOSURES:
Funding was provided by the Ministry of Science and Technology and the Ministry of Health and Welfare. The authors have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.